| |
| 科研成果 |
|
|
 |
|
| 论文题目： |
Comparison of two fractal interpolation methods |
| 第一作者： |
Fu Y(傅洋);Zheng ZY(郑泽宇);Xiao R(肖睿);Shi HB(史海波) |
| 参与作者： |
|
| 联系作者： |
|
| 发表刊物： |
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications |
| 发表年度： |
2017 |
| 卷,期,页： |
469,,563-571 |
| 论文出处： |
|
| 第一作者所在部门： |
|
| 论文编号： |
|
| 论文摘要： |
As a tool for studying complex shapes and structures in nature, fractal theory plays a critical role in revealing the organizational structure of the complex phenomenon. Numerous fractal interpolation methods have been proposed over the past few decades, but they differ substantially in the form features and statistical properties. In this study, we simulated one- and two-dimensional fractal surfaces by using the midpoint displacement method and the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method, and observed great differences between the two methods in the statistical characteristics and autocorrelation features. From the aspect of form features, the simulations of the midpoint displacement method showed a relatively flat surface which appears to have peaks with different height as the fractal dimension increases. While the simulations of the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method showed a rough surface which appears to have dense and highly similar peaks as the fractal dimension increases. From the aspect of statistical properties, the peak heights from the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot simulations are greater than those of the middle point displacement method with the same fractal dimension, and the variances are approximately two times larger. When the fractal dimension equals to 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.8, the skewness is positive with the midpoint displacement method and the peaks are all convex, but for the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method the skewness is both positive and negative with values fluctuating in the vicinity of zero. The kurtosis is less than one with the midpoint displacement method, and generally less than that of the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method. The autocorrelation analysis indicated that the simulation of the midpoint displacement method is not periodic with prominent randomness, which is suitable for simulating aperiodic surface. While the simulation of the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method has strong periodicity, which is suitable for simulating periodic surface. |
| 论文全文： |
|
| 其他备注： |
|
| 附件下载： |
|
|
|
